The Ultimate CFP Submission Checklist (Free Download)
Tired of desk rejects from overlooked errors? Our battle-tested checklist catches 95% of submission pitfalls before they kill your paper. Download free and submit with confidence.
You’ve spent months on the research. The results are strong.
Then — desk reject.
Reason? Not the science. A 0.1 mm margin violation, wrong track, or submitting three hours late because you misread “AoE”.
We’ve watched this happen to over 400 000 submissions.
The fix is the same every time: a ruthless, repeatable pre-submission checklist.
Here it is — battle-tested, continuously updated, and completely free.
Download the Ultimate CFP Submission Checklist (PDF) →
(No email required. Instant download.)
Why Most Researchers Skip Checklists (And Pay the Price)
From the Founder:
I’ve chaired programs at A* conferences and reviewed hundreds of papers.
The painful reality: ~60–70 % of desk rejects and bottom-half scores are 100 % preventable.
Wrong venue, broken anonymity, formatting flags — none of these have anything to do with your contribution.
Top submitters (the ones with 5–10 accepts per year) treat submission like landing an airplane: every single switch gets checked, every time.
Their acceptance rate is consistently 6–10 percentage points higher than average.
This checklist is distilled from eight years of our internal data + feedback from thousands of users.
The Checklist, Broken Down & Timed (12–15 minutes total)
Do these phases in order. Skip nothing.
Phase 1 – Venue Fit (3 minutes)
Wrong conference = guaranteed rejection.
- Scope overlap ≥ 85 % (paste abstract into callforpaper.org → instant score)
- Last 3 years of accepted papers match your contribution type
- Correct track / session selected (use our “Recommended Track” suggestion)
- Venue prestige aligns with your goals (CORE/CCF rank, not predatory)
Phase 2 – Content Quality Gates (4 minutes)
Make reviewers want to bid high.
- Title follows the 2026 formula:
[Adjective] [Method] for [Problem] in [Setting] (± [Result]) - Abstract: Problem → Gap → Method → Key Result → Broader Impact (150–250 words)
- Related-work comparison table on page 2 (✓/✗ columns)
- All figures referenced, readable in grayscale, ≥ 300 DPI
- Reproducibility appendix + fully honest checklist completed
Phase 3 – Formatting & Anonymity Lockdown (4 minutes)
Automated tools reject before humans even see your PDF.
- Exact conference LaTeX/Word template used (no modifications)
- Page limit respected (body only; references separate if allowed)
- PDF passes automated check
- Anonymity sweep: search PDF for names, institution, “our previous work”, arXiv author lists
- No identifiable GitHub links or acknowledgments
Phase 4 – Logistics & Deadline Armor (2 minutes)
Never get burned by timezones or crashes again.
- Deadline converted to UTC and added to calendar
- Reminders set: T-7 days (final review), T-24 h, T-2 h (submit)
- All co-authors have signed off on final version
- Backup PDF + source files saved
- Submission ID recorded immediately after upload
Phase 5 – Post-Submit (30 seconds)
- Add to personal tracker
- Start scouting backup venues (just in case)
Print It, Tape It, Use It Every Time
That’s it. Fifteen minutes of discipline = dramatically higher acceptance odds.
Download the printable one-page version here:
→ Get the Free Ultimate CFP Submission Checklist
(Works for NeurIPS, ICML, CVPR, ACL, SIGGRAPH, CHI, and 500+ others.)
What’s the dumbest submission mistake that’s ever cost you a paper? Drop it below — we learn from every horror story.
See you in the accepted papers list.
—The callforpaper.org Team
Cite this guide
Continue reading
How to Verify IEEE, ACM & Springer Conference Claims
Learn how to verify if a conference is really affiliated with IEEE, ACM, Springer, or Elsevier — plus red flags that signal a false claim.
Jul 1, 2026Academic Research9 Deadly Conference Submission Mistakes Researchers Make
Most papers get rejected for avoidable reasons — wrong venue, bad formatting, missed scope. Fix these 9 deadly mistakes before you hit submit.
Nov 24, 2025Academic ResearchWe Open-Sourced a Dataset of Predatory Conferences — Here's Why
Why we created a community-maintained, open dataset of predatory academic conferences and how we're using it to keep researchers safe.
Jun 26, 2026